AI for Risk Reduction in Construction Projects: Examining Safety, Cost, and Schedule Impacts

Authors

  • Mounir El Khatib Hamdan bin Mohamad Smart University
  • Khalid Karam Mubarak Hamdan bin Mohamad Smart University
  • Ammar Alshemeili Hamdan bin Mohamad Smart University
  • Ahmed Alhammadi 200123364@hbmsu.ac.ae

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54489/ijbas.v6i1.601

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Construction Risk Management, Predictive Analytics, Safety Performance, Cost Control, Schedule Management, Machine Learning, UAE Construction

Abstract

Abstract

The construction sector has long grappled with recurring safety failures, chronic cost overruns, and persistent schedule slippages. Even with well-established project management frameworks in place, outcomes across the industry remain far below what they should be. A significant part of the problem lies in how risks are handled — specifically, the fact that most organisations continue to operate reactively, addressing problems only after they have already made their mark on project performance.

This paper investigates how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be brought into construction risk management in a structured, systematic way — not as a standalone fix, but as a layer that fundamentally changes how teams detect, interpret, and respond to risk. The study draws on a qualitative research approach. Nine professionals — drawn from project management, safety engineering, and planning roles — were interviewed across live construction projects in the UAE. Their responses were examined through the thematic analysis process developed by Braun and Clarke (2006), organised around five key variables drawn from existing research.

What emerged from the interviews was consistent across participants: AI tools shift the entire frame of risk management from reaction to anticipation. Safety violations that previously went undetected for hours were flagged within minutes. Cost deviations that would have surfaced only in monthly reviews were visible three to four weeks earlier. These are not trivial differences — they represent the gap between managing a crisis and preventing one.

That said, the research makes clear that these benefits are not automatic. Three recurring obstacles cut across nearly every organisation studied: fragmented data environments, insufficient skill among staff, and deep-seated resistance to changing established working habits. Without confronting these directly, AI remains an expensive tool that underdelivers. The paper concludes with a five-pillar framework designed to guide organisations through the full implementation journey.

 

References

Badhan, & Samsami. (2025). Computer vision applications for construction safety monitoring and compliance detection. Automation in Construction. (Verify volume, issue, and pages.)

Baker, T., Johnson, M., & Lee, P. (2019). Machine learning approaches for predicting construction safety incidents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. (Verify publication details.)

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company.

Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (2011). How to manage project opportunity and risk: Why uncertainty management can be a much better approach than risk management (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409

Gao, Y., Chen, H., & Zhang, L. (2026). Artificial intelligence forecasting models for schedule risk prediction in construction projects: A systematic review. Automation in Construction. (Verify publication details.)

Hillson, D. (2017). Practical project risk management: The ATOM methodology (3rd ed.). Management Concepts Press.

Love, P. E. D., Smith, J., & Irani, Z. (2018). Understanding and managing cost overruns in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management. (Verify volume, issue, and pages.)

McKinsey & Company. (2020). The next normal in construction: How disruption is reshaping the world’s largest ecosystem. (Verify exact report title.)

Mohamed, A., Hassan, M., & Al Suwaidi, K. (2025). AI-enabled early warning systems and cost variance reduction in UAE construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management. (Verify publication details.)

Onososen, A., Adeyemi, T., & Bello, S. (2026). Evaluating AI-based safety monitoring systems in live construction environments. Safety Science. (Verify publication details.)

Sahraoui, M. (2025). Bridging the gap between artificial intelligence research and construction project practice. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. (Verify publication details.)

Sammour, H., Al-Harthy, M., & Rashid, A. (2024). Data integration maturity and AI implementation success in construction organizations. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. (Verify publication details.)

Tian, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence applications in construction cost forecasting: A systematic review. Automation in Construction.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

AI for Risk Reduction in Construction Projects: Examining Safety, Cost, and Schedule Impacts. (2026). International Journal of Business Analytics and Security (IJBAS), 6(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.54489/ijbas.v6i1.601

Similar Articles

1-10 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>